MORRISTOWN: WORSE THAN VALLEY FORGE
John T. Cunningham (1979)
John T. Cunningham’s vivid address on the hardships endured
by the “Winter
Soldiers” during the Second Morristown Encampment of 1779-1780 was delivered
in the middle of the Bicentennial of the American Revolution. He is marking
the 225th anniversary this year by writing a full-length history of Washington’s
three winters behind the Watchung Mountains in Morris and Somerset counties.
Cunningham’s address is rich with firsthand descriptions by Dr. James
Thacher and Joseph Plumb Martin of what historians agree was the coldest winter
of the
18th Century, and its impact on an army of 9,000 who were “exactly like
the soldiers of Viet Nam in the 1970's—out of sight, out of mind, out
of sympathy.”
My title on this spring-like day really should be Morristown's Winter Soldiers, for when I talk today about Morristown in 1779-80, I will stress two things—the unbelievably cruel weather and the even more unbelievable soldiers who took from that winter horrors far worse than anything that the British ever inflicted in battle.
Winter
soldiers: the phrase comes indirectly from Thomas Paine. Paine never used
the words, as such, but they were much on his mind in late November of 1776
when
he sat in a park in Newark and wrote the first words of his Crisis Papers.
Those words of Paine ought to be emblazoned everywhere— ought to be
read, taught, remembered, made part of every person's knowledge of history
and knowledge
of literature. The words shine in their sparse beauty. They begin:
These are the times that try men's souls;
The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will,
In this crisis,
Shrink from the service of his country;
But he that stands it now,
Deserves the love and thanks of man and woman.
Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered;
Yet we have this consolation with us:
That the harder the conflict,
The more glorious the triumph.
What we obtain too cheap,
We esteem too lightly;
'Tis darkness only that gives everything its value.
Heaven knows how to put a proper price on its goods.
And it would be strange indeed,
If so celestial an article as Freedom
Should not be highly rated.
Three long years had passed since Paine had written those words, when
Washington rode into Morristown on December 1, 1779, to face the fifth
winter with his army.
Lexington, Concord, Bunker Hill, Trenton, Princeton, Saratoga, even Monmouth,
were almost distant memories by December 1, 1779.
Many in the infant nation — and particularly many in Congress—had
long since wearied of this general who couldn't seem to bring the enemy to its
knees. They were asking, as it might be put today: “What have you done
for us lately?” Such questions were especially easy to ask
from the security of the warm homes enjoyed by Congressmen.
Washington properly might have replied in quick defense: “We
did well at Monmouth in June of '78.”
“True,” even the most grudging would admit, “true, but Monmouth
was at best a draw and it had occurred 17 months before. Lately,
say this summer of 1779, what have you done, Mr. General?”
I theorize Washington as replying: “Well, there were the battles at Stony
Point and Paulus Hook—both tidy little American victories.”
And I can hear the response: “Those weren't tidy little victories, General;
those were tidy little skirmishes—and don't forget that the
British moved right back into Stony Point when Wayne left.”
I continue my imaginary dialogue: “General, what about that
embarrassing disaster at Penobscot Bay in Maine last summer? Nearly
500 men and 40 ships
were lost in a fool expedition. And what about Savannah, given
up in October 1779,
with another 1,800 precious soldiers lost? Where, Mr. General,
are the victories?”
Congress really did not want any answers, for genuine
answers would have bared the inescapable fact that
Congress and
the 13 States
had acted—and continued
to act—abominably in their lackluster support of the army,
in their refusal to heed Washington's urgings that a regular army
be established,
in their refusal
to do anything about the galloping inflation spreading ruin across
the nation.
Action to feed, house, clothe, and arm the American
forces inevitably would have led to a proper system
of taxation.
Congressmen preferred
to think
that the United
States of America had been founded to escape taxes,
with or without representation.
A lesser man than Washington would not have been
in Morristown that December 1; he would long ago
have
ridden southward
to warm retirement in Mount
Vernon. But Washington stayed. And, because he
stayed, so did the army, for by now
it was an army loyal to him. I do not believe that
it is possible to avoid the fact
that Washington—and Washington alone—saved the Revolution.
The army marched into Morristown from the North
and East, headed for the desolation of Jockey
Hollow. By mid-December,
nearly
9,000 men were camping
out under the
walnut and oak trees on the slopes at Jockey
Hollow.
In retrospect, the number of soldiers headed
for Jockey Hollow was astonishing, considering
that
in 1776, when
Thomas Paine
wrote his words about "summer
soldiers and sunshine patriots," fewer than 5,000 soldiers
were with Washington. After the great victory at Trenton, during
January of 1777, when
the American
army also had been in Morristown, fewer than 1,000 soldiers answered
roll call.
Now, three years later, about 9,000 men had
made their choice in December. They were here
to vie
with yet
another winter.
Imagine the impact of that army of 9,000 soldiers
on Morristown in December 1779. This was a
village of
about 250 persons.
Washington's Life Guard
alone had more
members than there were citizens in the village.
All of Morris County had only about 8,500 people.
Thus,
the influx
of soldiers
doubled the population.
And what an army this was—ragged, straggling, bearded, dirty,
dressed in every conceivable kind of tattered uniform and armed
with everything from
clubs
and pitchforks to ancient muskets and Pennsylvania long rifles.
There was little effort at discipline or snappy marching, for these
hardened soldiers
had clearly
established that they were not fighting to be like the overdressed,
over-drilled, over-stupid soldiers of King George the Third.
The mere sight of such a motley cast of thousands
must have sent every Morris County husband
and father into
the house
to warn
his females to
stay out of sight
for the duration. I am sure, too, that
all farmers for miles around put extra locks
on their chicken
coops and
hid their
cattle deeper in the woods.
These
invaders had a lean and hungry look.
Traditional history has been cluttered with
romantic tales of the cleanliness and dignity
and undying
chivalry of
Revolutionary War
soldiers, the kind
of men from whom we like to be descended.
The usual image is of handsome, well-fed “Jersey
Blue,” dressed in a spanking clean uniform, armed with a
glistening new rifle, and chivalrous to a fault. That kind of soldier
is useful mainly
in
selling insurance.
The men marching into Morristown in December
1779, were tough, battle-hardened, desperate
soldiers.
They were
bitter, disillusioned,
starving, neglected,
forgotten. In many ways, those soldiers
of 1779 were exactly like the soldiers of Viet
Nam in the 1970's—out of sight, out of mind, out of sympathy.
These were the winter soldiers, officers
and men. These were the remnant who stayed,
knowing
full
well that
hundreds of
thousands of young men just
like themselves
were comfortable at home in every state
from New Hampshire to the Carolinas. This cannot
be stressed
too emphatically:
Those
winter soldiers at Morristown
were the men who won the Revolution.
General Nathanael Greene, the Army's Quartermaster
General, had personally inspected the Jockey
Hollow site, and
he reported on December 1—the day that Washington
reached Morristown—that the area "is mountainous and uneven; and,
therefore, will not be so agreeable as I could wish." That
was probably the understatement of the century.
Slightly more than a week later, on December
9, the optimistic General Greene wrote
concerning the building
of huts: "Our
hutting goes on rapidly, and our troops will be under cover in
a few days."
Why Greene wrote in that bubbling spirit
will never be known. Had he visited Jockey
Hollow
on December
9, he
could have
seen that his optimism was totally
unwarranted.
Less than a week later, on December 14, Dr.
James Thacher, the Massachusetts surgeon
who was one
of the deeply
committed winter
soldiers, arrived at
Jockey Hollow as a member of General Stark's
Brigade. Thacher saw no evidence of
completed huts in what he called "this wilderness."
The snow on the ground already was two feet
deep, Dr. Thacher wrote, and the weather
was “extremely cold.”
Thacher's diary etches the winter soldiers
into vivid memory: “The
soldiers are destitute of both tents and blankets, and some of
them are actually barefooted
and nearly naked.”
Actually “barefooted and nearly naked!” How desperate
for independence can men get?
Dr. Thacher wrote how the officers spread
their blankets on the ground, pulled their
greatcoats
close about
them, built
roaring
fires at their
feet, and huddled
up to one another in groups of six or eight
for shared warmth. Remember that they were
officers,
the most
privileged; most
of the enlisted men
had neither
greatcoats nor blankets.
It is necessary now to place Morristown and
Jockey Hollow in the larger weather pattern
of the winter
of 1779-80,
for cold
had not settled alone
on Morristown.
The best study of Colonial and Revolutionary
War weather that I have ever read is a
little-known book by David
Ludlam of
Princeton, titled, simply
enough, Early
American Winters, 1604 to 1820.
Ludlam's careful analysis of the weather,
based on diaries, newspaper accounts, army
reports,
and official
summaries
of the period,
makes it abundantly
clear, from a bare bones statistical standpoint,
that not only was this the worst
winter of the war— worse by far than Valley Forge—but
it was also far and away the worst winter of the 18th century.
Ludlam points out that weather historians
refer to a period beginning in 1750 and
extending for about
a century
as “A little ice age” or “the
cool one hundred years.” The winter that I am considering today was called “The
Hard Winter.” The prolonged cold and incessant snow reached
as deep south as Georgia and as far north as frozen fingers could
be found to write.
There is no possible way for anyone to describe
fully in limited time the viciousness of
that winter. There
is no
possible way
to relive it, in an
age when winter
suffering is only that awful agony we undergo
while waiting for the car to heat up.
There were 28 separate snowstorms recorded
at Morristown from November 1779, to April
1780.
At least two
of the falls were
of genuine
blizzard proportions—and
by real blizzard proportions I do not mean the kind of few hours
of wind-driven snow that enthusiastic TV people now call a blizzard
and prove it with their
charts and pointers. By blizzard I mean howling winds, biting cold,
and snow piling up and drifting for two or three days at a time.
The winter of 1779-80 was the only time in
recorded history that the Hudson River
froze so solidly
that sleighs could
be driven
between Paulus Hook
(now Jersey
City) and New York. Simultaneously, The
New Jersey Gazette reported that sleighs could
be driven
on the Delaware
River ice from Trenton
to Philadelphia.
Ice froze
to reported thicknesses of six feet in
the Passaic and Raritan Rivers. Every East Coast
seaport
from Virginia north was
closed for weeks by ice.
So much for the national weather, as they
say on TV. Now back to our man on the local
scene,
Dr.
Thacher. Let him
describe
the worst of the blizzards,
a storm
that roared wildly through the Morris County
area in
the first week on January, 1780. Dr. Thacher
wrote:
On the 3d instant, we experienced one of the most tremendous snow storms ever remembered; no man could endure its violence many minutes without danger of his life. Several marquees were torn asunder and blown down over the officers' heads in the night, and some of the soldiers were actually covered while in their tents, and buried like sheep under the snow . . .
My comrades and myself were roused from sleep by the calls of some officers for assistance; their marquee had blown down, and they were almost smothered in the storm, before they could reach our marquee, only a few yards, and their blankets and baggage were nearly buried in the snow.
We are greatly favored in having a supply of straw for bedding, over this we spread all our blankets, and with our clothes together, preserve ourselves from freezing. But the sufferings of the poor soldiers can scarcely be described. While on duty they are unavoidably exposed to all the inclemency of storms and severe cold; at night they now have a bed of straw on the ground, and a single blanket to each man; they are badly clad, and some are destitute of shoes.
So much for General Greene's huts that were
to be in place by December 14. Indeed,
it was Valentine's
Day—February 14— before
the last of the huts had been completed.
Yet the winter had only begun to extract
its insidious toll. Again my witness, man-on-the-scene,
Dr. Thacher,
speaks,
this time on about January 10:
For the last ten days we have received but two pounds of meat a man, and we are frequently for six or eight days entirely without bread. The consequence is that the soldiers are so enfeebled from hunger and cold, as to be almost unable to perform their military duty or labor in constructing their huts.
Also out there in the cold of Jockey Hollow
was a New England private, unknown to Dr.
Thacher. He was
Private
Joseph
Plumb Martin of Connecticut,
who left memoirs
that stamp him as probably the most carefree,
lackadaisical, honest, hell-fire soldier
in the
entire American
army.
Joseph Plumb Martin's memoirs have been republished
in an engaging little paperback book called
Private Yankee
Doodle.
Joseph
Martin served from
June of 1776 until
June of 1783— seven long years. He had fought in the battles of Long Island,
was in the thick of things at Monmouth, would fight at Springfield and would
ultimately follow Washington to Yorktown. Martin spent his winters in the camps—at
Valley Forge, Middlebrook, and Morristown.
What gives Private Joseph Martin's book such
rollicking insight was his total lack of
regard for what his
descendants might
think of him. Thus,
Martin told
how he and his fellow foot soldiers slogged
along in the mud or snow, drinking whatever,
and as
much, whiskey
as
they could
get, whistling at the girls
and, with the slightest encouragement,
dropping out of line to linger with a saucy
miss. Martin didn't hide the fact that
he and the other soldiers often borrowed from
neighboring
farmers without
benefit of
formal army requisitions.
It is fair to say that Joseph Plumb Martin
was the first “GI Joe”—the
very essence of the kind of men who chose to go wherever George
Washington led, and the very essence of the kind of men who have
answered the nation's
calls
ever since.
When Martin wrote of suffering, his words
must be heeded, for he was apt to see the
brightest
side
of the darkest
days. At
Valley
Forge, for example,
he
wrote
how he and his mates had bedded down in
straw—and “felt
happy that pigs were no better off than ourselves.”
At Valley Forge, too, Martin wrote that
Congress had ordered a day of thanksgiving,
so that
the soldiers, who had been
unfed for
three days, could give thanks
for what Martin called “our high living.” After a long sermon, in which
the minister offered thanks for the supposed bounties which the men had received,
Martin wrote that he went back to his tent and “made my supper
as usual, out of a leg of nothing and no turnips.”
Now, two years later, here he was at Jockey
Hollow, still in what might laughingly
have been called
a uniform, and possessed
of a
blanket “thin enough to
have straws shot through it without discommoding the threads.” It
certainly was no security blanket.
Let Private Yankee Doodle Martin tell about
Jockey Hollow as he saw it:
Our destination was at a place in New Jersey near Basking Ridge. We arrived on our wintering ground in the latter part of the month of December, and once more, like the wild animals, began to make preparations to build us a “city for habitation.” The soldiers, when immediately going about the building of their winter huts, would always endeavor to provide themselves with such tools as were necessary for the business (it is no concern of the reader's, as I conceive, by what means they procured their tools)..
Do not blame them too much, gentle reader, if you should chance to make a shrewd yankee guess how they did procure them; remember they were in distress, and you know when a man is in that condition he will not be overscrupulous how he obtains relief, so he does obtain it.
We encamped near our destined place of operation and immediately commenced to build. The snow was more than a foot deep, and the weather none of the warmest. We had to level the ground to set our huts upon. When digging just below the frost, which was not deep, the snow having fallen early in the season, we dug out a number of toads, that would hop off when brought to the light of day as lively as in summertime. We found by this where toads take up their winter quarters, if we can never find where swallows take up theirs.
The suffering went on. In mid-February,
Martin wrote:
We were absolutely, literally starved. I do solemnly declare that I did not put a single morsel of victuals into my mouth for four days and as many nights, except a little black birch bark which I gnawed off a stick of wood, if that can be called victuals. I saw several of the men roast their old shoes and eat them, and I was afterwards informed by one of the officers's waiters, that some of the officers killed and ate a favorite little dog that belonged to one of them.
Martin declared:
If this was no “suffering” I request to be informed what can pass under that name. If “suffering” like this did not “try men's souls”" I confess that I do not know what could.
Washington was well aware of the paralyzing
hunger that struck the camp after the early
January
blizzard. Since
each state
was supposed to bear
the brunt of
feeding the army that it was fortunate
to have as guests, Washington wrote to the New
Jersey
Legislature on January
9, 1780:
The present state of the army, with respect to provisions, is the most distressing of any we have experienced since the beginning of the war. For a fortnight past the troops, both officers and men, have been almost perishing for want.
As might be expected, the cautious New Jersey
Legislature failed to welcome such a bearer
of bad tidings.
I assume that the
matter was referred to
the Committee
on Starving Soldiers for study in the spring,
or as soon thereafter as the army had moved
on to
another state.
Washington wearied of pleading with politicians.
On January 8, he ordered armed detachments
of soldiers to visit
leading officials
in each county,
asking them
to send in bread and wheat.
If the officials showed any reluctance, Washington
ordered the men to take the provisions “with as much tenderness as possible.” They also were
instructed to take, if necessary, wagons to carry the food. The message was clear:
the food would be had at gunpoint if necessary. Officials cooperated, sometimes
cheerfully. In modern parlance, Washington had “made them
an offer they could not refuse.”
Those unwilling to give might have been
expected to sell. But Dr. Thacher pointed
out that
even buying was difficult
because
of runaway inflation.
In 1780, one
silver dollar had become worth, at most,
about thirty paper dollars.
New Jersey was not peculiar in its reluctance
to feed the army. Many Pennsylvania farmers
near Valley
Forge
grew
fat and sleek
in the winter of 1777-78 by
selling their products to the British in
Philadelphia while soldiers in their own
nation's
army starved to death nearby.
The Jockey Hollow army lived off the neighbors
as much as possible, often being the beneficiaries
of
warm-hearted
hospitality,
but just as often—possibly
more often—making their visits in the dark of night to escort
a few hens or a lonely cow back to camp, where, with proper ceremonies,
the hens
and cows
served as sacrifices to the never-ending fight for freedom.
The terrible severity of that winter of 1779-80
was difficult to describe, even for those
who were there.
General Johann
De Kalb noted in February,
1780:
Those who have only been in Valley Forge or Middlebrook during the last two winters, but have not tasted the cruelties of this one, know not what it is to suffer.
Many years later, in 1955, Douglas Southall
Freeman, the distinguished Virginia biographer
of Washington,
would
write without qualification
that “the
winter of 1779-80 at Morristown was a period of far worse suffering
than the corresponding
months of 1777-78 at Valley Forge.”
But even if the weather had been warm, the
food plentiful, and the clothing ample,
the winter
would have been
a shocker, for
it brought the astonishing
news that
one of America's greatest generals, Benedict
Arnold, faced an army court martial in
Morristown.
Arnold was a man of courage. In the esteem
of the army and Congress alike, he stood—at worst— second only to Washington. Many in Congress felt
that he was the nation's finest field commander, and Arnold agreed. Arnold had
been twice severely wounded—in the same leg—at Quebec
in 1775 and at Saratoga in 1777.
To simplify it, Arnold's court martial was
based on charges that he had enriched himself
and had
dealt leniently
with Tories while
he was military
commander of
Philadelphia in 1778-79. The trial began
in the Dickerson Tavern in Morristown on
December
23,
1779.
Arnold prepared carefully for this trial,
and well he might, for he had demanded
that he
be given
a court martial
by
fellow officers so that he
might be found
innocent of the charges. Washington had
personally begged Arnold the previous
May not to seek
the trial, and gave
in only on
Arnold's insistence.
Arnold could walk, if he wished, with little
more than the suggestion of a slight limp,
but as he
strode into
Dickerson's
Tavern to
face his fellow
officers on
December 23, 1780, he limped badly, as
befitted the hero of Saratoga. He wore a spotless
uniform and
played artfully
the
role of a
great soldier
who had been
desperately offended by the allegations
against him.
It was an artful performance—and at the same time a thoroughly despicable
performance—for it would be discovered later that this man
who was so indignant at Morristown in December had been dealing
directly with the
top
British command
since the previous May! In modern terms, it was as if a man who
had sold the secret of the atom bomb were being tried for taking
hams from the mess
hall.
Arnold dared his fellow officers to challenge
his military record, and they did drop
most of the
charges against
him. Despite his
vigorous protestations,
Arnold
was found guilty on two minor counts.
Washington was asked to reprimand the
convicted general.
He did so
as gently
as possible,
trying to placate
the enraged Arnold.
Many agreed with Arnold at the time that
he had been wronged. His defection to the
British
seven
months
later was more
shocking because of his lavish
show of
innocence.
Arnold paraded and strutted in all his wounded
vanity that winter, all the while callously
trying to get
British General
Clinton
to raise the
ante that he would
pay for Arnold's betrayal of America. It
was no longer a question of what Arnold
had become;
all
that was
at issue for Arnold
personally that winter
was the price.
Strutting and artificiality was not confined
to Arnold. Many of the officers in town
that winter
decided
that the place
needed to be enlivened by a
series of regular dances, called “an Assembly.”
Washington himself wrote of the dances to
a friend in Philadelphia on February 29,
1780,
seeming
to be proud
that “we have opened an Assembly in camp.” He
hastily went on: “From this apparent ease, I suppose it is
thought that we must be in happy circumstances. I wish it was so,
but alas, it is
not.”
Be that as it may, 34 persons, including
Washington and other top army officers,
paid 400 dollars
apiece for
a dancing
Assembly. That money went
to pay a dancing
master and to rent Arnold's tavern for
a few nights. Apologists for the Assembly have
since
hastened
to point out that
inflation had made the total
contributions
of $13,600 worth only $300 in silver money.
The Rev. Joseph F. Tuttle, 19th century historian,
wrote that he was at first offended on
first reading by the
seemingly shocking contrast between
the candle-light
dances and the suffering at Jockey Hollow,
but then Tuttle went on in mixed apology
and explanation:
Let us rather admire than condemn these brave men at Morristown, who were striving to invest the stern severities of that winter with something of the gayer and more frivolous courtesies of fashionable life.
Unfortunately for posterity, what Private
Joseph Plumb Martin thought of those Assemblies
was
not recorded.
While he ate
bark, dandies danced. I
am sure Martin
could have been court-martialed for his thoughts.
One of the men who paid his $400 for the
privilege of dancing was Captain William
Tuttle, who
previously had
written:
There was a path which led from the Wicke house down to the Jersey camp and I have often seen that path marked with blood, which had been squeezed from the cracked and naked feet of our soldiers, who had gone up to the house to ask an alms!
Certainly no men with cracked and naked feet would have wanted to dance anyway.
The question properly is raised: why did
any men, but particularly enlisted men,
continue to endure
at Jockey
Hollow in the
face of the all-too-evident
mass indifference
of the public at large? Consider that in
a
nation of about three million people, only
9,000 soldiers
were
at Jockey
Hollow in
December 1779.
Not all stayed. Many of the soldiers quickly
left Jockey Hollow as soon as their nine-month
enlistment
period
ended in late
December. The army
rolls
fell steadily—down
to 5,600 persons in January, down to 4,800 in April.
One account tells that there were 1,072 deserters
during the winter of 1779-80. Each month
also saw an average
of 153 men
absent without
leave—an official
figure. It can be assumed that far larger numbers of soldiers wandered
in and out of camp as they saw fit. Who, or what, was to stop them?
Who was
to blame
them?
Despite the cold, the starvation, the privation,
it is estimated that there were only about
305 deaths in camp
that winter.
I say “only” because
more than 2,000 died at Valley Forge in the winter of 1777-78.
Bruce Stewart, who
wrote the brief history of Morristown in the Revolution, titled,
Crucible of Revolution, believes that the low total of deaths was
because the very
sickest
of men were sent elsewhere to die. It is also probable that many
of those listed as deserters or absent without leave limped home
to die where they
might be
loved and comforted for even a tiny time.
And it can only be conjectured that many
of those half-naked, shoeless, starving
soldiers at Jockey
Hollow suffered
all the rest of their days
from infirmities
due to the winter of 1778-79. Frozen fingers
or frozen feet never regain strength.
Spring came with agonizing, bittersweet
slowness. After a warm spell in mid-March
raised hopes,
more snow swept
Jockey
Hollow
at the end of the
month. April 1
fooled everyone: about ten inches of snow
fell that day.
But, in time, the winter would end. The soldiers
would move out of Jockey Hollow, to fight
the Battle of Springfield,
to move
onward for another
year, on to another
winter. Nothing eases the anguish of winter
better than the
sweet flirtation of spring.
But men who survived that Morristown winter
left their thoughts. I have chosen two
that are starkly
in contrast.
One classic letter of disgust was written
by Major Ebenezer Huntington on July 7,
1780, after he had
endured the
Morristown winter.
He was not a dancer by the
way. Huntington wrote:
I despise my countrymen. I wish I could say I was not born in America. I once gloried in it but now am ashamed of it—the insults and neglects which the army met from the country, beggars all description. It must go no farther, they can endure it no longer. I have wrote in a passion, indeed I am scarce ever free from it. I am in rags, have lain in the rain on the ground for 40 hours past and only a junk of fresh beef and that without salt to dine on this day, received no pay since last December. Constituents complaining and all this for my cowardly countrymen who flinch at the very time their exertions are wanted and hold their purse strings as tho they would damn the world, rather than part with a dollar for the army.
Bear in mind that Huntington was an officer—supposedly one
of the best fed and best attended of those stationed at Morristown
in 1779-80.
On the other hand, an enlisted man who also
lived through that winter was able to write:
I am in the hopes the army will be kept together till we have gained the point we have so long contending. For if the army could be supported I have not the least reason to think that a man would wish to leave it till peace and harmony was restored to a bleeding but unconquered and still to be conquered country. For my own part, if we was paid according to agreement, I could wish I had two lives to loose in defense of so glorious a cause sooner than bee over come —I was free born and if I can supporting selfe I will stand or fall in defense of my country.
What did my chief witness, Dr. Thacher think
? He wrote:
It is a circumstance greatly to be deprecated, that the army, who are devoting their lives, and everything dear, to the defence of our country's freedom, should be subjected to such unparalleled privations, while in the midst of a country abounding in every kind of provisions.
And what about Private “GI Joe” Martin? He wrote:
When General Washington told congress the soldiers eat every kind of horse food but hay, he might have gone a little further and told them that they eat considerable of hog's fodder and not a little of dog's—when they can get it.
In short, Private Martin declared: “I'm hungry!”
Winter soldiering gets scant attention in
the history books; it pales beside the
supposed glories and
violent gore of
bloody battlefields.
That is why Morristown has not earned its
rightful place in history. That is why
it took a group
of private citizens—the Washington Association—to
save the Ford Mansion, one of the nation's great historic houses. That is why
it took one citizen— Lloyd Smith—to buy the land of
Jockey Hollow and present it to the National Park Service in 1933.
Without Lloyd Smith's foresight, I have no
doubt that Jockey Hollow today would be
covered with
a myriad
of houses on
three-acre plots.
Of course
there would
be a small bronze plaque somewhere, vandalized
with paint spray, telling of the sufferings
there —but not too large a plaque,
lest it interfere with real estate decor.
I still see only the scantest of interest
in Morristown and Jockey Hollow on the
part of
our town, county,
and state
governmental leaders. I have
yet to
hear of any kind of major national commemoration
being shaped for Morristown for 1779-80—but
then there wasn't much a stir about Valley Forge, either. Thanks
only to the Washington Association and the National Park Service,
we will at least
remember
1779-80.
We just can't seem to warm up to winter soldiers.
They disturb us, with their astonishing
fidelity to a cause
that we might
secretly believe would
have been
too much for us. Soldiers slowly freezing
to death on a Jockey Hollow Hill are far
less
dramatic than
men being
slain by
bullets.
I suppose that it might make a statistical
difference whether a soldier dies in battle
or whether he
freezes to death
in a lean-to.
It is doubtful whether either of those
death possibilities ever is acceptable
or preferable
to soldiers who
must face them.
Death from starvation, traceable in part
to one's selfish neighbors, is not pleasant.
Nor
is death
from exhaustion
on a frozen,
slippery road between
Jockey Hollow
and Morristown something to welcome.
Those winter soldiers died often—slowly, agonizingly, despairingly.
Far more died in winter camps than in summer battles. The wonder
is that mutiny
did not come sooner, that desertions from the ranks were not greater
at Jockey Hollow,
The selfish, grasping quest for power in Congress should have discouraged
even the toughest of armies.
Yet the army stayed together. Soldiers slept
in the snow. They walked barefoot on the
hard ground.
They
hugged
blankets to
freezing bodies. They starved.
They kept the faith alive.
Why did they keep the faith? I don't know.
I often ask myself this. Was it patriotism,
an
innate quest
for freedom,
a passion
for independence—all
of these? I don't know. I just don't know. No one ever will know.
We can only be grateful
that, for whatever cause, the winter soldiers of 1779-80 never
quit.