|
Previous
Page | Next
Page
Florio's $2.8 billion tax increase in 1990
made New Jersey's state income tax the most progressive in
the nation, doubling the maximum rate from 3.5% to 7%. Republican
Governor Whitman's income tax cuts actually made the income
tax rate structure even more progressive; rates were cut 30
percent for middle income, 15 percent for upper middle income
and 10 percent for upper income, while eliminating more than
350,000 low-income taxpayers from the income tax rolls altogether.
As a result, an income tax that had ranged from 2% to 3.5%
in 1989 now ranges from 1.4% to 6.37%. The gulf between the
New Jersey income tax's 4.5-to-1 ratio of progressivity from
upper to lower income taxpayers is actually wider than the
current 2.6-to-1 ratio of progressivity on the federal income
tax would indicate because New Jersey taxes all capital gains
as ordinary income, while the federal government taxes long-term
capital gains at just over half the top income tax rate for
upper income taxpayers.
In New Jersey, the 12 percent of taxpayers
making more than $100,000 a year are expected to pay 80 percent,
or $6.8 billion, of the $8.6 billion anticipated from the
state income tax. The 2 percent of taxpayers earning over
$250,000 are expected to pay more than $4.3 billion of the
$8.6 billion total.
"(Assembly Budget Committee Chair)
Leonard Lance and I always talk in budget hearings about how
our reliance on high-income taxpayers and financial markets
helped accelerate tax growth in the 1990s when income growth
was substantial. But if that levels off, we're in for a hard
landing," said Assembly Appropriations Committee Chair Richard
Bagger, R-Union.
There is little doubt that hard landing
is coming. For New Jersey's wealthiest taxpayers, the recession
is already here.
WALL STREET WOES: For the
past year, the stock markets have been staggering, with the
World Trade Center attack triggering a further decline that
virtually guarantees that all of the major indices will end
the year well in the red.

CAPITAL GAINS AND LOSSES: The Office of Legislative Services'
May 2001 budget analysis noted that capital gains tax revenue
has correlated with the rise in the Nasdaq and other stock
indices. Treasury officials expected a 9.5 percent increase
to more than $900 million in capital gains revenue in FY02,
but The Nasdaq has been falling steadily all year, and at
1696 in mid-Cctober, had dropped 31.3% since January 1.

From January 1 to October 15, the
Nasdaq Composite was down 31.3% for the year, the Standard
& Poors 500 was off 17.4%, and the Dow Jones Industrial
Index was 13.3 percent in the red.
Last June, the Department of Treasury was
still anticipating more than $900 million in capital gains
tax revenue based on its assumption that capital gains realizations
would rise 9.5 percent in FY02. That gain was based on an
analysis of three growth scenarios offered by Mark Zandi of
Economy.com: (1) a high-growth scenario under which the S&P
500 would rise 13.2% from an average of 1347 in FY01 to 1525
in FY02; (2) a mid-level scenario that projected a 4.1% rise
in the S&P 500 from 1335 to 1390; and (3) a low-growth
scenario under which the S&P would drop 9.5% from 1326
to 1200.
By mid-October, even after a mild rebound
following the late September drop, the S&P 500 stood at
1089, well below Zandi's worst-case scenario, and Zandi last
spring was considered a pessimist. If the S&P 500 continues
at approximately this level for the year, the Office of Legislative
Services' prescient forecast last May of a 25 percent drop
in capital gains tax receipts in the current FY02 budget would
be hard to attain. OLS's estimate would put New Jersey's capital
gains tax receipts in the $630 million range.
James W. Hughes, dean of Rutgers University's
Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy,
said a drop in capital gains receipts to as little as $400
million is not unthinkable. "In these up cycles, we have been
astounded each year by the growth in capital gains," Hughes
said. "Now we have no idea how capital gains revenues are
going to behave in a down cycle, except that it's going to
go down."
David J. Rosen, chief of the OLS Revenue,
Finance and Appropriations section, said "predicting how far
capital gains revenues will spike downward is just as hard
as predicting how far they will spike up.
"But it isn't just the capital gains
tax revenues that are affected by the Wall Street decline,"
he said. "It's the bonuses, stock options and commissions,
and all are taxed as income. You would have to expect bonuses
and stock options to be way down."
The State of New Jersey does not track
Wall Street commissions, stock options and bonuses separately,
but estimates range from $500 million to $1 billion per year
of state income tax revenue coming from this source.
"For every million-dollar Wall Street
bonus paid to a New Jersey resident, New Jersey receives $63,750
in income tax," Bagger noted. "That doesn't include any economic
spinoff or other tax revenue generated based on how that million
dollars is invested or spent."
It is hard to envision big Wall Street
bonuses in a year in which not only are stock markets down,
but many Wall Street firms have had to shoulder the additional
expense of moving operations from Lower Manhattan to midtown
or New Jersey.
For legislative budget-makers like Bagger
and Lance, and whomever the new governor brings in as treasurer,
the problem is that the impact of the Wall Street woes on
New Jersey's current-year budget will be one of the last variables
factored into the mix.
"We're not really going to know the
extent of the problem until late in the year," Bagger acknowledged.
"During the big growth years, the income tax actually brought
in $1 billion in payments on just one day, April 15th. That's
very late in the appropriations process."
Budget experts surveyed agreed privately
that the combined effect of the decline in capital gains tax
revenues and other Wall Street-related income alone is likely
to cost the New Jersey treasury at least $600 million and
perhaps as much as $1 billion in tax receipts.
Previous
Page | Next
Page
Mark Magyar
is president of the Public Policy Center of New Jersey and
editor of New Jersey Reporter magazine.
|